Today, oCERT published advisory 2015-003 describing a TLS vulnerability in MySQL and derivative products.  The content isn’t exactly news – it is documented legacy behavior and the subject of an earlier blog post describing how MySQL Server 5.7 solves the problem.  That said, the efforts of Duo Security are certainly appreciated and welcomed – it provides a meaningful context to discuss how to properly harden existing MySQL 5.5 and 5.6 deployments, as well as frame a discussion on potential changes in these versions to increase security.

Vulnerability

The vulnerability described in the advisory relies on the legacy behavior of the client …

I’ve written previously about use cases where having accounts which cannot be used to establish client connections are useful. There are various hacks to accomplish this with legacy versions (insert invalid password hash into mysql.user table, etc.), and we introduced the mysql_no_login authentication plugin for this very purpose. Now as of MySQL 5.7.6, account locking gets native support through the ACCOUNT LOCK clause of CREATE USER and ALTER USER commands. This post revisits the use cases which drove this feature and the implementation details.

Use Cases

Security …

What?

MySQL 5.7 server binaries compiled with the OpenSSL library now make it easy to set up SSL/TLS and RSA artifacts, and to enable them within MySQL. Two new read-only global options have been introduced through this work:

• --auto-generate-certs: Enables automatic generation and detection of SSL artifacts at server start-up.
• --sha256-password-auto-generate-rsa-keys: Enables automatic generation of an RSA key pair.

These options govern automatic generation and detection of SSL/TLS artifacts and RSA key pairs respectively. Auto generated files are placed inside the data directory, and both options now default to ON.

For the …

As noted in an earlier post, MySQL Server 5.7 prefers and enables SSL/TLS connections by default.  That’s great and useful progress towards secure connections, but we know that not all SSL/TLS ciphers are created equal – some are older and more vulnerable.  Furthermore, some recent vulnerabilities rely on the ability to negotiate less-secure ciphers during the handshake.  Monitoring which ciphers are used can help identify connections using low-grade ciphers, but also to build an appropriate restricted cipher list.  Using improvements to PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA introduced in 5.7, you can now easily do this – and this post will show you how.

The cipher used for each TLS connection is stored in a …

Complimenting the expanded CREATE USER syntax introduced in MySQL Server 5.7.6 is more useful ALTER USER syntax.  Before MySQL Server 5.7.6, ALTER USER could only be used to expire a user’s password.  That’s pretty limited.  With changes made in MySQL Server 5.7.6, a better distinction is made between privilege-level attributes (those which are managed via GRANT and REVOKE statements) and account-level attributes (those managed using CREATE USER and ALTER USER statements).  MySQL has a long history of confusing these – for example, requiring a GRANT …

As I wrote earlier, we want the default experience in MySQL 5.7 to be secure by default.  Part of this includes securing connections by automatically creating key material and using TLS for connections where possible.  This may have some significant implications for third-party software – especially products which depend upon capturing, evaluating and/or redirecting client/server traffic at the network level.  This blog post is intended to highlight for developers and users of such products potential issues they may want to consider or address during the pre-GA period for MySQL Server 5.7.

What types of products are dependent upon access to unencrypted protocol data?  Most immediately apparent are proxy-based and network capture-based products.  Proxy-based products typically rely on the same characteristics which can …

MySQL 5.7 aims to be the most secure MySQL Server release ever, and that means some significant changes in SSL/TLS.  This post aims to tie together individual enhancements introduced over the span of several Development Milestone Releases (DMRs) into the larger initiative.  In the simplest terms, we hope to have a minimal TLS configuration enabled by default, and for connections to prefer TLS by default.  Let’s dig into the various aspects of this:

Generation of TLS key material

MySQL Server has long supported TLS connections, yet very few deployments are actually configured to leverage this.  This is partly because creation of key material – the certificates and keys needed to establish TLS connections – is a multi-step, extra, manual process.  Basic TLS concepts have to be understood, third-party software …

Prior to MySQL 5.7, the CREATE USER command had a number of limitations:

• No way to set both authentication plugin and password
• No way to disable a user
• No way to define user resource limitations
• No way to set a non-default password expiration policy
• No way to require SSL/x509

All of these things could be done through other means, but typically involved other statements, such as GRANT commands.  Starting with MySQL 5.7.6, these can all be done through a new and improved CREATE USER syntax:

Passwords and authentication plugin

The most important aspect to me, from a security perspective, is the ability to now create user accounts with non-default authentication plugins (like sha256_password) and a non-blank password:

mysql> CREATE USER new@localhost
-> IDENTIFIED WITH sha256_password …

MySQL has provided support for proxy users since version 5.5, but the roles-like capabilities offered have been largely unnoticed until recently.  Part of that has been due to limitations on which types of accounts could leverage proxy user capabilities.  This changes with the release of MySQL Server 5.7.7 (Release Candidate), which includes support for proxy user mapping for the standard mysql_native_password and sha256_password authentication plugins.  This post will introduce the new functionality and explain how to leverage it to emulate certain features …

Years ago when I worked for the MySQL Support organization at the original MySQL AB, we spoke about MySQL Support as insurance and focused on a value proposition similar to that of car insurance. For your car to be fully covered, you must purchase car insurance before the incident happens – in fact most places around the world require automobile insurance. Similarly with many organizations, any production-use technology might be mandated to have its own insurance in the way of 24/7 support.

I think however this is a very one-sided view that does not capture the full value (and ROI) that a MySQL Support contract with Percona provides. Let’s look at the different dimensions of value it provides based on the different support cases we have received throughout the years.

Reduce and Prevent …