Most of us are lucky that software bugs are a small part of our lives. The ‘things just work’ attitude works for most situations, but occasionally something appears that may seem trivial at first glance may be catastrophic.

A bug appeared in MySQL’s recently released 8.0.32 that really caught my attention. This is a prime example of how a minor bug could have a significant impact on your life and a detrimental impact on your company or project.

The title Wrong result for AVG() OVER(ROWS BETWEEN 1 FOLLOWING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING) is the first thing that caught my eye. A lot of developers heavily use the AVG() function. My first thought was, ‘ut-oh, AVG() being broken is a terrible thing,’ but then I realized it was thankfully not that drastic.

The OVER() clause indicates this is a problem in a Window Function. And odds are, if you are using OVER() for …

A year ago, I blogged about An Unprivileged User can Crash your MySQL Server.  At the time, I presented how to protect yourself against this problem without explaining how to generate a crash.  In this post, I am revisiting this vulnerability, not giving the exploit yet, but presenting the fix.  Also, because the default configuration of Group Replication in 5.7 is still vulnerable (it is not in

A few weeks ago and in MySQL 5.7, I had an ALTER TABLE that failed with a duplicate entry error.  This is old news as it is happening since MySQL 5.6, but I only saw this recently because I am normally using online schema change from the Percona Toolkit (pt-osc) or GitHub's online schema migration (gh-ost).  I do not like that and I am disappointed this has not been improved, so this post is

Yes, your read the title correctly: an unprivileged user can crash your MySQL Server.  This applies for the default configuration of MySQL 8.0.21 (and it is probably the case for all MySQL 8 GA versions).  Depending on your configuration, it might also be the case for MySQL 5.7.  This needs malicious intent and a lot of determination, so no need to panic as this will not happen by accident.  I am

In this blog post, we’ll look at does the Meltdown fix affect performance for MySQL on bare metal servers.

Since the news about the Meltdown bug, there were a lot of reports on the performance hit from proposed fixes. We have looked at how the fix affects MySQL (Percona Server for MySQL) under a sysbench workload.

In this case, we used bare metal boxes with the following specifications:

• Two-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2683 v3 @ 2.00GHz (in total 56 entries in /proc/cpuinfo)
• Ubuntu 16.04
• Memory: 256GB
• Storage: Samsung SM863 1.9TB SATA SSD
• Percona Server for MySQL 5.7.20
• Kernel (vulnerable) 4.13.0-21
• Kernel (with Meltdown fix) 4.13.0-25

Please note, the current kernel for Ubuntu 16.04 contains only a Meltdown fix, …

After upgrading some of our slaves to latest 5.7, I have found  what looks like a serious regression introduced in MySQL 5.7.
A couple weeks ago I noticed that the error log file of one of our clusters, where I had implemented my in place transparent compression of binary logs,  was literally flooded by the following error:

[ERROR] Binlog has bad magic number;  It's not a binary log file that can be used by this version of MySQL

In the above setup this is  an harmless error, and it should only happen at server startup, where mysqld opens and reads all available binary log files.  The error is due to the fact that since files are now compressed, mysqld doesn't recognize them as valid - not an issue, as only older files are compressed, and only after …

Here's something that has puzzled me for several weeks.
Right after migrating  MySQL from 5.6 to 5.7, we started experiencing random xtrabackup failures on some, but not all, of our slaves.
The failures were only happening when taking an incremental backup, and it would always fail on the same table on each slave, with errors similar to the following:

171106 13:00:33 [01] Streaming ./gls/C_GLS_IDS_AUX.ibd
InnoDB: 262144 bytes should have been read. Only 114688 bytes read. Retrying for the remaining bytes.
InnoDB: 262144 bytes should have been read. Only 114688 bytes read. Retrying for the remaining bytes.
InnoDB: 262144 bytes should have been read. Only 114688 bytes read. Retrying for the remaining bytes.
InnoDB: 262144 bytes should have been read. Only 114688 bytes read. Retrying for the remaining bytes.
InnoDB: 262144 bytes should have been read. Only 114688 bytes read. Retrying for …

Long time no post.... :-)
Here's something interesting.

Last week I decided to give MySQL 5.7 a try (yes, I am kinda conservative DBA...) and the very same day that I installed my first 5.7 replica I noticed that, after changing my own password on the 5.6 master, I could no longer connect to the 5.7 slave.

Very annoying, to say the least! So I went and dug out the root password (which we do not normally use) and when I connected to the slave I was surprised to see that my password's hash on the 5.7 slave was different than the hash on the 5.6 master. No wonder I couldn't connect....

A bit of research on the MySQL documentation and I understood that 5.7 introduced few changes around the way you work with users' passwords.  SET PASSWORD is now deprecated in favour of ALTER USER: see MySQL 5.7 Reference Manual …

Sometimes MySQL surprises you in ways you would have never imagined.

Would you think that the order in which the indexes appear in a table matters?
It does. Mind you, not the order of the columns - the order of the indexes.
MySQL optimizer can, in specific circumstances, take different paths, sometimes with nefarious effects.


Please consider the following table:

CREATE TABLE `mypartitionedtable ` (
  `HASH_ID` char(64) NOT NULL,
  `RAW_DATA` mediumblob NOT NULL,
  `EXPIRE_DATE` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  KEY `EXPIRE_DATE_IX` (`EXPIRE_DATE`),
  KEY `HASH_ID_IX` (`HASH_ID`)
) ENGINE=TokuDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 ROW_FORMAT=TOKUDB_UNCOMPRESSED
/*!50100 PARTITION BY RANGE (UNIX_TIMESTAMP(EXPIRE_DATE))
(PARTITION p2005 VALUES LESS THAN (1487847600) ENGINE = …

If you are using Percona XtraBackup with

xbcrypt

 to create encrypted backups, and are using versions older than 2.3.6 or 2.4.5, we advise that you upgrade Percona XtraBackup.

Note: this does not affect encryption …