PS_history is a tool which collects historical snapshots of the PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA (P_S). This allows you to trend P_S values over time, for example, it is possible to look at the 95 th percentile response time for a query over time.

PS_history is stored procedure and event based, and thus it resides entirely inside of the database with no external dependencies. It uses a clever technique to capture all of the P_S data in one consistent snapshot. This ensures that all of the sys_history views (bundled now with PS_history) have a consistent set of data.

By default, as long as the event_schedule is enabled, PS_history will collect data every 30 seconds. If a snapshot takes 30 seconds, there will be a 30 second delay before the next snapshot starts. This value can be changed by calling the `ps_history`.`set_collection_interval`(N) where N is the number of seconds between samples.

The `sys_history` schema is …

PS_history is a tool which collects historical snapshots of the PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA (P_S). This allows you to trend P_S values over time, for example, it is possible to look at the 95 th percentile response time for a query over time.

PS_history is stored procedure and event based, and thus it resides entirely inside of the database with no external dependencies. It uses a clever technique to capture all of the P_S data in one consistent snapshot. This ensures that all of the sys_history views (bundled now with PS_history) have a consistent set of data.

By default, as long as the event_schedule is enabled, PS_history will collect data every 30 seconds. If a snapshot takes 30 seconds, there will be a 30 second delay before the next snapshot starts. This value can be changed by calling the `ps_history`.`set_collection_interval`(N) where N is the number of seconds between samples.

The `sys_history` schema is …

When I queried information_schema.innodb_trx (introduced in 5.1 with the InnoDB Plugin) I noticed there were a few transactions in LOCK WAIT state.

Example:

mysql [information_schema] > select trx_id,trx_state 

    -> from information_schema.innodb_trx;
+--------+-----------+
| trx_id | trx_state |
+--------+-----------+
| 7974   | LOCK WAIT |
| 7962   | RUNNING   |
+--------+-----------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)

Then I made a query to join a few information_schema and performance_schema tables to find out which query was blocking my transactions. It turned out that the blocking transaction had a trx_query=NONE. So my query was block by a transaction doing nothing. That's not really helpful.

Let's try to recreate the situation and see exactly what happened. I'll use two sessions for the transactions and a third to monitor the …

MySQL’s Performance Schema is an incredibly rich and versatile instrumentation engine, but apparently, with great power, comes increased complexity for the user to understand up front.

I think this is pretty natural:

• The more flexibility you provide to the user on what to monitor (and this is one of the major goals of Performance Schema) – the more there is to twiddle from a configuration perspective.
• The more data we provide in as generic a ways as possible – the more data there is.

Performance Schema is also only going to grow over time. There are many many missing bits of instrumentation within MySQL that users want us to add, and for the most part, most of those new things are now going in to Performance Schema. Things such as memory …