The utf8mb4 character set is the new default as of MySQL 8.0, and this change neither affects existing data nor forces any upgrades.

Migration to utf8mb4 has many advantages including:

• It can store more symbols, including emojis
• It has new collations for Asian languages
• It is faster than utf8mb3

Still, you may wonder how migration affects your existing data. This blog covers multiple aspects of it.

Storage Requirements

As the name suggests, the maximum number of bytes that one character can take with character set utf8mb4 is four bytes. This is larger than the requirements for utf8mb3 which takes three bytes and many other MySQL character sets.

Fortunately, utf8mb3 is a subset of …

Following my post MySQL 8 is not always faster than MySQL 5.7, this time I decided to test very simple read-only CPU intensive workloads, when all data fits memory. In this workload there is NO IO operations, only memory and CPU operations.

My Testing Setup

Environment specification

• Release | Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (bionic)
• Kernel | 4.15.0-20-generic
• Processors | physical = 2, cores = 28, virtual = 56, hyperthreading = yes
• Models | 56xIntel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5120 CPU @ 2.20GHz<
• Memory Total | 376.6G
• Provider | packet.net x2.xlarge.x86 instance

I will test two workloads, sysbench oltp_read_only and oltp_point_select varying amount of threads

sysbench oltp_read_only --mysql-ssl=off --report-interval=1 --time=300 …

In this blog post, we’ll discuss how to set a replication from MySQL 8.0 to MySQL 5.7. There are some situations that having this configuration might help. For example, in the case of a MySQL upgrade, it can be useful to have a master that is using a newer version of MySQL to an older version slave as a rollback plan. Another example is in the case of upgrading a master x master replication topology.

Officially, replication is only supported between consecutive major MySQL versions, and only from a lower version master to a higher version slave. Here is an example of a supported scenario:

5.7 master –> 8.0 slave

while the opposite is not supported:

8.0 master –> 5.7 slave

In this blog post, I’ll walk through how to overcome the …

Modern applications often feature the use of data in many different languages. This is often true even of applications that only offer a user facing interface in a single language. Many users may, for example, need to enter names which, although using Latin characters, feature diacritics; in other cases, they may need to enter text which contains Chinese or Japanese characters. Even if a user is capable of using an application localized for only one language, it may be necessary to deal with data from a wide variety of languages.

Additionally, increased use of mobile phones has lead to changes in communications behaviour; this includes a vastly increased use of standardized characters intended to convey emotions, often called “emojis” or “emoticons.” Originally, such information was conveyed using ASCII text, such as “:-)” to indicate happiness – but, as noted, this has changed, with many devices automatically converting such …

In this blog, I will provide answers to the Q & A for the Troubleshooting Issues with MySQL Character Sets webinar.

First, I want to thank everybody for attending the March 9 MySQL character sets troubleshooting webinar. The recording and slides for the webinar are available here. Below is the list of your questions that I wasn’t able to answer during the webinar, with responses:

Q: We’ve had some issues converting tables from

utf8

  to

utf8mb4

. Our issue was that the collation we wanted to use –

In our latest article at Database Journal we talk about Character Sets in MySQL.  What are they?  How do they affect searching?  How do they affect data that is inserted or updated?  How can I set and control the for an application or globally in my database?  And what pre-tell is collation?  We answer all these questions and more.

Database Journal – Understanding MySQL Character Sets

We have written before about the importance of using numeric types as keys, but maybe you've inherited a schema that you can't change or have chosen string types as keys for a specific reason. Either way, the character sets used on joined columns can have a significant impact on the performance of your queries.

Take the following example, using the InnoDB storage engine:

PLAIN TEXT SQL:

1. CREATE TABLE `t1` (
2. `char_id` char(6) NOT NULL,
3. `v` varchar(128) NOT NULL,
4. PRIMARY KEY (`char_id`)
5. ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
6.  
7. CREATE TABLE `t2` (
8. `id` int UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
…