Replication has been the core functionality, allowing high availability in MySQL for decades already. However, you may still encounter replication errors that keep you awake at night. One of the most common and challenging to deal with starts with: “Got fatal error 1236 from source when reading data from binary log“. This blog post is […]

MySQL 8.0.23 introduces a new feature that makes replication possible from a source server that has been configured without Global Transaction Identifiers (GTIDs) to a replica server configured with GTIDs. This can be achieved by configuring replication channels to use the parameter ASSIGN_GTIDS_TO_ANONYMOUS_TRANSACTIONS with the CHANGE REPLICATION SOURCE command.…

Tweet Share

At my FOSDEM talk earlier this year, I gave a trick for fixing a crashed GTID replica.  I never blogged about this, so now is a good time.  What is pushing me to write on this today is my talk at MinervaDB Athena 2020 this Friday.  At this conference, I will present more details about MySQL replication crash safety.  So you know what to do if you want to learn more about

GTID-based replication makes managing replication topology easy: just CHANGE MASTER to any node and voilà. It doesn’t always work, but for the most part it does. That’s great, but it can hide a serious problem: missing writes. Even when MySQL GTID-based replication says, “OK, sure!”, which is most of the time, you should double check it.

GTID-based replication makes managing replication topology easy: just CHANGE MASTER to any node and voilà. It doesn’t always work, but for the most part it does. That’s great, but it can hide a serious problem: missing writes. Even when MySQL GTID-based replication says, “OK, sure!”, which is most of the time, you should double check it.

GTID-based replication makes managing replication topology easy: just CHANGE MASTER to any node and voilà. It doesn’t always work, but for the most part it does. That’s great, but it can hide a serious problem: missing writes. Even when MySQL GTID-based replication says, “OK, sure!”, which is most of the time, you should double check it.

In my previous post (Puzzled by MySQL Replication), I describe a weird, but completely documented, behavior of replication that had me scratching my head for hours because it was causing data corruption.  I did not give too many details then as I also wanted allowing you to scratch your head if you wished.  In this post, I describe this behavior in more details.

But first I need to

Recently, I was puzzled by MySQL replication !  Some weird, but completely documented, behavior of replication had me scratching my head for hours.  I am sharing this war story so you can avoid losing time like me (and also maybe avoid corrupting your data when restoring a backup).  The exact justification will come in a follow-up post, so you can also scratch your head trying

MySQL auto-positioning is an integral part of replication with GTID, but it’s neither required nor guaranteed to work. It’s possible to enable GTIDs but disable auto-positioning, and it’s possible that one MySQL instance cannot auto-position on another even when GTIDs are used. The former (GTID on but auto-pos off) is an issue for another time. The latter is the topic of this post: when MySQL GTID auto-positioning fails—and how to fix it.

MySQL auto-positioning is an integral part of replication with GTID, but it’s neither required nor guaranteed to work. It’s possible to enable GTIDs but disable auto-positioning, and it’s possible that one MySQL instance cannot auto-position on another even when GTIDs are used. The former (GTID on but auto-pos off) is an issue for another time. The latter is the topic of this post: when MySQL GTID auto-positioning fails—and how to fix it.