Tweet

There are many nice changes included in the MySQL 8.0.12 release that were published a couple of days ago. One of the most exciting is the ability to make instant schema changes to tables. This blog will look into why I think that that is a stand-out change.

I will not go into details with the implementation other than noting that the new data dictionary in MySQL 8.0 has allowed for a nice implementation of the patch that was contributed by the Tencent Games DBA Team. If you are interested in learning more about the implementation, I will recommend you to read the blog by Bin Su ( …

Introduction –

              MySQL 8.0.10 GPL came out with more changes and advanced features. We have changes on InnoDB physical file layout ( MySQL data directory ) too. This blog will provide the information about the MySQL 8 InnoDB physical files.

MySQL system tables are completely InnoDB now ?

              Yes, Previously, we don’t have too many InnoDB tables on MySQL system tables. We have the innodb_index_stats, innodb_table_stats, slave_master_info, slave_relay_log_info and slave_worker_info in MySQL 5.7 as InnoDB tables. But, now all the MySQL System  tables were converted to InnoDB from MySQL 8.0 . It helps in the transactional DDL’s .

Below are the list of InnoDB physical files on MySQL 8.0 .

• ibdata1
• .ibd …

The choice of good InnoDB primary keys is a critical performance tuning decision. This post will guide you through the steps of choosing the best primary key depending on your workload.

As a principal architect at Percona, one of my main duties is to tune customer databases. There are many aspects related to performance tuning which make the job complex and very interesting. In this post, I want to discuss one of the most important one: the choice of good InnoDB primary keys. You would be surprised how many times I had to explain the importance of primary keys and how many debates I had around the topic as often people have preconceived ideas that translate into doing things a certain way without further thinking.

The choice of a good primary key for an InnoDB table is extremely important and can have huge performance impacts. When you start working with a customer using an overloaded x1.16xlarge RDS instance, with close …

Welcome to the third part of this series. I’m glad you’re still reading, as hopefully this means you find this subject interesting at least. Previously we presented the first two components of MySQL InnoDB Cluster: Group Replication and MySQL Router and now we will discuss the last component, MySQL Shell.

MySQL Shell

This is the last component in the cluster and I love it. Oracle have created this tool to centralize cluster management, providing a friendly, command-line based user interface.

The tool can be defined as an advanced MySQL shell, which is much more powerful than the well known MySQL client. With the capacity to work …

MySQL InnoDB Cluster is an Oracle High Availability solution that can be easily installed over MySQL to provide high availability with multi-master capabilities and automatic failover. In the previous post we presented the first component of InnoDB Cluster, group replication. Now we will go through the second component, MySQL Router.  We will address MySQL Shell in a final instalment of this three-part series. By then, you should have a good overview of the features offeed by MySQL InnoDB Cluster.

MySQL Router

This component is responsible for distributing the traffic between members of the cluster. It is a proxy-like solution to hide cluster topology from applications, so applications don’t …

MySQL 8.0 has come with a list of new features for DBA’s ,we will discuss the new feature in MySQL 8.0 which supports Descending index.Prior to MySQL 8.0 (i.e MySQL 5.6 and 5.7) creating desc index syntax was supported but desc keyword was ignored, Now in MySQL 8.0 release descending index is extended are supported.

What is index?

• Indexes play an important role in performance optimization  and they are used frequently to speed up access to particular data and reduce disk I/O operations .
• To understand index easily you can imagine a book,every book has an index with content referring to a page number.If you want to search something in a book you first refer to the index and get the page number and then get the information in the page,like this the indexes in MySQL will tell you the row with matching data.

…

The common wisdom with database performance management is that a “cold” database server has poor performance. Then, as it “warms up”, performance improves until finally you reach a completely warmed up state with peak database performance. In other words, that to get peak performance from MySQL you need to wait for database warm up.

This thinking comes from the point of view of database cache warmup. Indeed from the cache standpoint, you start with an empty cache and over time the cache is filled with data. Moreover the longer the database runs, the more statistics about data access patterns it has, and the better it can manage database cache contents.

Over recent years with the rise of SSDs, cache warmup has become less of an issue. High Performance NVMe Storage can do more than 1GB/sec read, meaning you can warm up a 100GB database cache in less than 2 minutes. Also, SSD IO latency tends to be quite good so you’re not …

Since MySQL 5.7 we have a new player in the field, MySQL InnoDB Cluster. This is an Oracle High Availability solution that can be easily installed over MySQL to get High Availability with multi-master capabilities and automatic failover.

This solution consists in 3 components: InnoDB Group Replication, MySQL Router and MySQL Shell, you can see how these components interact in this graphic:

In this three blog post series, we will cover each of this components to get a sense of what this tool provides and how it can help with architecture decisions.

Group Replication

This is …

This post is mainly inspired by findings from the previous testing of MySQL 8.0 on TPCC workload(s) and observations from IO-bound Sysbench OLTP on Optane -vs- SSD. But also by several "urban myths" I'm often hearing when discussing with users about their IO-bound OLTP performance problems :
Myth #1 : "if I'll double the number of my storage drives -- I'll get x2 times better TPS !"

• this was mostly true during "HDD era", and again..
• (ex.: a single thread app doing single random IO reads from a single HDD will not go faster by doing the same from 2x HDD -- similar like single thread workload will not run faster on 8CPU cores -vs- 2CPU cores, etc.)
• all depends …

MySQL Performance on IO-bound workloads is still extremely depending on the underlaying storage layer (thus is directly depending on your Storage Performance).. Indeed, flash storage is definitively changing the game, but even with flash there is, as usual, "flash and flash" -- all storage vendors are improving their stuff constantly, so every time you have something new to discover and to learn ;-)) During all my MySQL 8.0 GA tests I was very pleasantly surprised by IO performance delivered by Intel Optane SSD. However, what the storage device can deliver alone on pure IO tests is not at all the same to what you could observe when it's used by MySQL -- unfortunately, in the past I've observed many cases when with a device claimed to be x2 times faster we were even not observing 10% gain.. But MySQL 8.0 is probably the most best placed MySQL version today to re-visit all this IO-bound story (there are many "under-hood" changes in the code helping to …