By Andy Oram
I've been doing a lot of research recently into the patent system. The impetus is the history-making Peer to Patent project, and specifically an article I recently finished for the Economist magazine. ("A patent improvement" in the September 8, 2007 issue, Technology Quarterly section.)
This blog is not about the Economist article or Peer to Patent, but about how several months of immersion in the subject of patents has affected my understanding of related policy issues, and how my opinions differ from many of my friends in the software field.
Patents are necessary to promote invention
One of the fuzzier notions making its rounds in the software field condemns patents as backward and oppressive. Not just software patents--some people …
[Read more]