It always surprises me how knee-jerk we can be in the open source world. If someone writes a glowing report of Project X, we slobber all over ourselves to salute them, however inaccurate they might be. If someone indicates a need for improvement, we slam them.
My recent post on OpenOffice is a case in point. I just don't think it's very good, and I also don't think it matters that it's not very good (because my goal in life is not to beat Microsoft at its game, but rather to make Microsoft play on my turf. Here are a few reasons OpenOffice is weak, and is not likely to ever attain Apache/Linux/BIND/etc. status.
-
OpenOffice isn't a piece of software that most developers care about, and developer-aligned open source software is much more likely to be superior software. If there's no itch to be …