Matt Asay proposes the following definition to the answer what consititudes an "open source company" that I blogged about yesterday: "An open source company is one that, as its core revenue-generating business, actively produces, distributes, and sells (or sells services around) software under an OSI-approved license."
I see a lot of merit in this definition. However it does shut out companies like EnterpriseDB that do proprietary extensions while feeding a lot of code back to the open source parent. Of course you can point to the fact that the product they sell is not open source.
This however is the only code based business model around BSD projects. Without picking favorites, I personally do appreciate the fact that BSD style projects produce an ecosystem that …
[Read more]