Did I push to much in my last post? I don’t think so, but I guess it’s a fragile balance sometimes in Open Source between those keen end users, and the developers that do give so much towards their own creations (I understand, I’m in that category myself).

I was very proud of my work yesterday, it took a whole day of my time (I do have better things to do, like finish my own Open Source project HTMLtags, while will allow me to build my sample application, which I can then use for my MySQL Users Conference presentation). I learnt to dig around the net a lot, go on the wild goose chase several times, understand some more under the hoods of compiling, libraries and dependencies in the GTK world I would have otherwise not really cared about. But as I said, I got to a brick wall by the end, and it was dishearting.

It …

This post is based entirely on unsubstantiated rumor. Word on the street is that SpikeSource is making the move to a new channel focused strategy. I don't want to gloat, but I told you that the existing business model was not sustainable. Unfortunately, I don't see how a channel model would work either.

There is no channel when it comes to software services. SIs won't give up the revenue to another services partner, it's an inherent conflict. And while channel deals are great for distribution (HP with JBoss or MySQL) there is no precedent on how much revenue can be derived from such deals. SIs will just build their own stack, or get a complete solution, including the OS from a big player like RedHat.

People are hell-bent that open source is all about services, but take a look at the companies that are doing well and you'll see that they also have products. …

One of the great benefits of Open Source, it’s Free, and you can get great support, sometimes even from the developers directly (rather then 5 levels of paid customer support for a commercial product). One of the greatest banes of Open Source, if you have a problem, and nobody has experienced and documented in a forum etc the problem you have with the same OS, libraries etc, you could be totally up the creek without a paddle, boat and for that matter water. (luckily you still have oxgyen)

Well, I’m having this problem with MySQL Workbench. A product promising so much, but if you can’t get the binary working on Linux to even start, where do you go.

You will see via the Forums, I’m not the only person. This is the current …

I’m stuck between a rock and a hard place. I’ve been using DBDesigner 4 from FabForce, an open source visual design tool, and apart from working around a number of bugs, I’ve found it practical to design from scratch. The big plus, it works under Linux.

With the announcement that this was being incorporated into MySQL, called MySQL Workbench, I was looking forward to getting my hands on it. I guess that was about 8 months ago. Finally about 6 weeks ago, Version 1.0.0-alpha was released for Linux. Unfortunately it didn’t work, would not even start for me. Logged as Bug #15421, which got marked as a duplicate of …

Would it not be great if on the MySQL website there was a page of stats (updated daily) that provided statistics like number of installations, a breakdown of versions registered (not certain I like that exact word) , OS’s, countries etc. More specifically, some useful stats on the engine types in practical use, avg number of tables per database etc. Of course the types of stats could be limitless, but with the success of MySQL as well as other open source projects, more imperial figures on installations other then just downloads I think would definitely benefit given the current momentum. (Availability of information to competitors could be both a good and bad thing.) Perhaps figures can be shown in percentages, not actual numbers.

Anyway, nice idea you say, we can all come up with ideas, but how could you implement something like this. …

There is a myth out there that open source offers a convenient way to save a dying company's proprietary product, or provides a way to head off the eventual bleeding dry of a successful closed-source product (like Oracle's database, for example). The 451 Group has news for you:

Nope. Sorry. Not going to happen.

In its Cashing in on Open Source report, they make the following point:

Pure plays commodifying new sectors and offering professional support may be profitable - some are remarkably so. Examples include the Linux distributors, JBoss and MySQL. Traditional companies, however, should not expect open source initiatives to contribute substantially to the bottom line. The cost of building a developer community (Eclipse, OpenSolaris, openadaptor, eBay) is a sunk cost. Returns are intangible, such as grassroots …

The 451 Group's Cashing in on Open Source report contains an off-hand comment that I think deserves more comment. It says:

Because human-readable programming languages compile to machine-readable binaries, it'?s possible to sell usable software without the source code attached.What The 451 doesn't point out is that the inverse corollary is also true: because most people don't care about source code, and because compiling from source to a binary executable is work/drudgery, you can make a business out of distributing free and open source code and charging customers a fat fee for a "certified" binary.

Don't believe me? Take Red Hat as an example. It makes its money by charging customers to get the magical, certified Red Hat. In truth, it's the same RHEL you can download for free, but the assurance of certification …

It always surprises me how knee-jerk we can be in the open source world. If someone writes a glowing report of Project X, we slobber all over ourselves to salute them, however inaccurate they might be. If someone indicates a need for improvement, we slam them.

My recent post on OpenOffice is a case in point. I just don't think it's very good, and I also don't think it matters that it's not very good (because my goal in life is not to beat Microsoft at its game, but rather to make Microsoft play on my turf. Here are a few reasons OpenOffice is weak, and is not likely to ever attain Apache/Linux/BIND/etc. status.

• OpenOffice isn't a piece of software that most developers care about, and developer-aligned open source software is much more likely to be superior software. If there's no itch to be …

The Linux Format magazine is having it’s annual reader awards in a number of categories.

These include (I’ve include my picks after each category):

• Best Desktop Application (Gnome)
• Best Distro (CentOS 4.2)
• Best Development Tool (Eclipse 3.1)
• Best Hardware Support (NVidia for my Dell Laptop)
• Free Software Project of the Year (Gaim)
• Embedded Linux Award
• Best Server Software (MySQL 5.0)
• Best Office Software (Open Office …

Sometimes I don't know whether to consider Laura Merling, Executive Director of SDForum, a friend or a foe. She and the SDForum team (in alliance with Andrew Aitken and the Olliance team) are putting on what looks to be an excellent open source event in January. Confound her for staging a quality event right before OSBC! :-)

SDForum's Open Source Think Tank

Seriously, I like the idea, and it's something to which my recent blog entry speaks: we need more intelligent discourse between members of the open source business community. SDForum's event is designed to be just that: a think tank for leading open source executives.

I've been fortunate to be friends with the executive teams at MySQL, SugarCRM, JasperSoft, and others. Talking …