I’m reviewing proposals, that have come in when we made the CfP for the MySQL Conference & Expo 2008, and I’ve noticed some bugs in the CfP process. So let me take a break, gripe, and go back to the grindstone. I wish more people read the instructions for CfP submission (I’m even referring to you experienced presenters, might I add).
Via the CfP page, it says be creative, descriptive, and specific. I delve into this a little more, and add some of my thoughts.
- Be creative - sure, a catchy title helps, but I personally review everything, even if you have the world’s most boring title
- Be descriptive - please, heed to this. Don’t tell me that you’re going to expand on the abstract if its accepted, and don’t tell …