In his well-written blog entry Open Development: Diversity matters, Gianugo Rabellino quickly replied to my blog entry from yesterday on Defining “Participatory Open Source”. He sees plenty of common ground in our reasoning, but defends the existence of requirements for neutrality in the definition. I agree with nearly all of his reasoning for why neutrality is important for the development of a community of contributors, but I draw partially different conclusions.
The main reason why my conclusions are different from Gianugo’s is the starting point for my reasoning: There is no inherent conflict of interest between participatory open source and pursuing for-profit business goals, so we must not create artificial …
[Read more]