Home |  MySQL Buzz |  FAQ |  Feeds |  Submit your blog feed |  Feedback |  Archive |  Aggregate feed RSS 2.0 English Deutsch Español Français Italiano 日本語 Русский Português 中文
Showing entries 1 to 30 of 42 Next 12 Older Entries

Displaying posts with tag: EU (reset)

The Oracle EU statement on MySQL – What’s missing
+7 Vote Up -2Vote Down

Many providers embedd MySQL (http://www.mysql.com/customers/embedded/) with their commercial products including Adobe, Macfee, Nokia, Symantec and ScienceLogic just to name a few. In addition most commercial third party storage engines have for years been forced to provided very customized versions of MySQL due to limitations in the storage engine API. These situations require a license agreement necessary with the trademark holder of MySQL. The Oracle Corporation EU Statement released on December 14, 2009 has carefully worded in the statement about these OEM licenses and storage engine providers there will be no changes for 5 years.

One specific detail is missing, what happens then?

As an individual that uses, recommends, promotes and advises clients

  [Read more...]
Option D
+3 Vote Up -1Vote Down

Lots of people writing about Snorkle again today ,Monty Says, help saving MySQL

He gives us different options, a , b or c .. but I , and some others, want an option d

No I don't trust Oracle, it's not like they have been a very good Open Source Citizen, yes they contribute to the kernel and other projects but my feeling says it's only because they have to (Kernel, Xen and others ) not because they Want to (thinking about Unfakable etc) , if they would really want to they probably would work with the CentOS community more etc, and as Monty mentions their InnoDB track record could be better.

But on the other hand I don't think the EU should block the deal because Monty wants his baby back , cheap , as honestly imvho that's what they really want, be able to buy MySQL back for a nice price, either beceause Oracle

  [Read more...]
The Future of MySQL (EU Crunch Time)
+2 Vote Up -5Vote Down

You’ve probably seen Monty’s post Help Saving MySQL. This is about

  • Development (will Oracle put significant effort into MySQL, actually innovating)
  • Brand (”MySQL” has a huge footprint), the trademark owner can enforce this – there have already been issues with companies offering MySQL related services via Google AdWords not being able to use the word MySQL in their ad text even though it was correctly used as an adjective.
  • Forking is fine, but still has to deal with the branding. For MySQL, that’s possibly the most significant issue of any OSS product ever encountered. You’re not competing against a company, but against an existing brand footprint that you (because of the trademark) have to steer clear of. So “just fork it”
  •   [Read more...]
    Possible movement in the Oracle/Sun/MySQL/EU case
    +0 Vote Up -1Vote Down

    From NY Post: Oracle Leader Blinks – Larry’s Olive Branch (to the EU), the NYpost sources apparently say that “what [...] Ellison is proposing is the creation of a firewall between MySQL and the rest of the combined company, and possibly setting up an entirely separate board for the MySQL business.”

    There is no independent confirmation of any of this, so it may be true, or just air, or a trial balloon to see how other parties respond… I’m not going to add opinions to this, I just reckon it’s an interesting progression in the case. We’ll see how it pans out.

    Update: so it’s not true (see Reuters).

    (so now I’ll add my

      [Read more...]
    Waiting for Godot, Migrating to JavaEE 6, and Other Highlights from Nov 21th, 2009
    Employee_Team +1 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    Today is Nov 21th, 2009.

    News shorts of interest to our communities, including:
    New date for EU review of Oracle/Sun acquisition, getting closer to v3 fcs, new OpenESB and OpenDS releases, Devoxx whiteboards, new customers and japanese event, and more.

    Waiting for Godot
    I read Waiting for Godot for HS, but I didn't expect to live it...



      [Read more...]
    Harish Pillay and Brian Aker debate with Richard Stallman (Part 2)
    +2 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    The attendees were not satisfied with the first answer RMS gave to Brian, that Harish Pillay (Chief Technical Architect, Red Hat Singapore), chose to ask RMS what more he had to say, with regards to the letter he’d written. He answered quite candidly in this video, which Brian chimed in for as well.



    The back channel for all this was Twitter… Don’t hesitate to follow @harishpillay, @brianaker, @piawaugh or even



      [Read more...]
    Brian Aker debates with Richard Stallman
    +4 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    At foss.my 2009, Brian Aker asked Richard Stallman at his keynote, about the Oracle/Sun acquisition (with a focus on MySQL), with regards to the parallel licensing approach used by MySQL. Brian was referring to:

    As only the original rights holder can sell commercial licenses, no new forked version of the code will have the ability to practice the parallel licensing approach, and will not easily generate the resources to support continued development of the MySQL platform.

    from Richard’s Letter to the EC opposing Oracle’s acquisition of MySQL. Listen to the discussion between Brian and Richard.





      [Read more...]
    EU Should Protect MySQL-based Special Purpose Database Vendors
    +2 Vote Up -0Vote Down
    In my recent post on the EU antitrust regulators' probe into the Oracle Sun merger I did not mention an important class of stakeholders: the MySQL-based special purpose database startups. By these I mean:

    I think it's safe to say the first three are comparable in the sense that they are all analytical databases: they are designed for data warehousing and business intelligence applications. ScaleDB might be a good fit for those applications, but I think






      [Read more...]
    Market share vs market impact
    +4 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    This is very relevant in the context of the EU probe of the Oracle-Sun takeover. MySQL’s share of the database market, which is usually measured by revenue, is of course peanuts and estimated range from half a percent to something slightly more. Peanuts.

    This is not surprising, considering an estimated 999 out of every 1000 MySQL users does not pay Sun/MySQL anything (although some might be Open Query clients and while MySQL has been targeting higher-end clients and corresponding higher revenue, its pricing is still far lower than the premium-cost of Oracle, DB2 and the like.

    All this proves very clearly something which I’ve been saying for years (do scan back in my blog , the definition of market share

      [Read more...]
    EU probes Oracle’s bid to buy Sun
    +3 Vote Up -2Vote Down

    It appears that little MySQL has just become a disproportionally big player in the Oracle-Sun takeover deal…. article by Associated Press: EU probes Oracle’s bid to buy Sun notes:

    EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said Thursday that regulators needed to examine the effect of a deal “when the world’s biggest proprietary database company proposes to take over the world’s leading open-source database company.”

    Ah, Neelie Kroes. Dutch lady from the liberal (that’s seriously right-wing in NL, my American friends party, formerly minister for infrastructure in NL, long time ago.

    So what can happen now? The EU

      [Read more...]
    MySQL a factor in EU's decision
    +3 Vote Up -0Vote Down
    I just read Björn Schotte's post on the activities of the European Union antitrust regulators concerning the intended takeover of Sun Microsystems by Oracle.

    Björn mentions a news article that cites EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes saying that the commission has the obligation to protect the customers from reduced choice, higher costs or both. But to me, this bit is not the most interesting. Later on the article reads:


    The Commission said it was concerned that




      [Read more...]
    Oracle, MySQL and the EU
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    Jan Wildeboer pointed us to the Mayflower post about their letter from the European Commission.

    It seems like the the European Commision , more specifically the Directorate General for Competition , really is interested in our input regarding the matter, I mailed them and also got a questionnaire to fill in.

    So if you have something interesting to tell them don't hesitate to contact them too.

    Technorati Tags: eu mysql orace   [Read more...]
    Sale on .EU domains
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down
    Following a promotion at the registry. We will be offering .EU domain creations for €4 excl. VAT instead of €12 excl. VAT. This sale will last until August 31st and does not concern renewals or transfers.
    451 CAOS Links 2008.10.31
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    Sun and Sourcefire report Q3 results. SpringSource elected to JCP executive committee. Alfresco launches Enterprise 3.0. How to go from 0 to 700 customers in one year. Open sourcing Jonathan Schwartz’s ponytail. And more.

    Press releases
    Sun Microsystems Reports Final Results for the First Quarter Fiscal Year 2009 Sun Microsystems

    Sourcefire Announces 2008 Third Quarter Results Sourcefire

    Sourcefire Adopts Stockholder Rights Plan Sourcefire

    SpringSource Elected


      [Read more...]
    ID group in the EP filed motion calling for balanced patent policy, criticizing the EPLA
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    Yesterday three groups in the European Parliament (PES, Greens/EFA, GUE/NGL) announced their motion for a resolution on patent policy. I published their press release earlier today on this Web site.

    In parallel, the Independence/Democracy group in the European Parliament (commonly abbreviated as ID or IND/DEM) filed this motion for a resolution on patent policy. The motion was put forward by Tom Wise, an MEP from the UK Independence Party who spoke out in strong terms against the software patent directive.

    The ID motion is

      [Read more...]
    PRESS RELEASE: European patent controversy heating up again
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    Three groups in the European Parliament (i.e., international-level parties) yesterday authorized me to distribute the press release below to my media contacts:

    European patent controversy heating up again

    PES, Greens/EFA and GUE/NGL groups in European Parliament file motion for resolution — Proposal calls for “balance between the interests of patent holders and the broader public interest in innovation and competitive markets” — Commissioner McCreevy’s preference, the EPLA, is seen as weakening EU democracy, increasing litigation costs and “exposing SMEs to greater

      [Read more...]
    EU commissioner McCreevy: software patents are ?a goal worth pursuing?
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    On Friday, EU internal market commissioner Charlie McCreevy (whose historical ties with Microsoft and similar companies are mentioned in my book) delivered this speech on his intellectual property rights (IPR) strategy. He flew all the way up to Helsinki for an informal meeting of the ECOFIN (economic & finance) Council of the European Union.

    In his speech, he said the European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA) “is a goal worth pursuing” and that he wanted to involve the EU in the EPLA negotiations “and bring them to finality”. He falsely claims that the EPLA would “offer valuable cost savings”: even Nokia

      [Read more...]
    Release 1.03 of my book No Lobbyists As Such
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    I fixed a couple of typos in my book No Lobbyists As Such - The War over Software Patents in the European Union. Thanks to Marco Menardi for having pointed me to those typos.

    At a glance: How they?re trying (again) to legalize software patents in Europe
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    I have previously reported in this blog how certain European politicians and patent bureaucrats are trying, once again, to give software patents a stronger legal basis in Europe. On 12 July, the European Commission held a public hearing in Brussels, and the European Parliament is shooting for a vote on a patent policy resolution toward the end of this month.

    If you’d like to know why the European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA) is, among other bad things, a road to software patents, please have a look at this two-page diagram (PDF file). And if you’re subsequently interested in some more background information and facts, this three-page briefing document

      [Read more...]
    Working on post-hearing matters
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    As I explained in this blog, it’s always a difficult decision for me to keep postponing my own project in order to work on the patent policy front. But once again, like so many times before, I have decided to do so for some more time. Given what happened at the July 12 hearing, there are some important things to do right away. I’ll talk a little more about my personal future on some other occasion, but suffice it to say that I’m still actively involved in the European patent policy debate!

    A career apart from campaigning
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    After I mentioned in this blog posting a week ago that I’d make an announcement on August 28 concerning my future priorities, I received different reactions. Mostly there seems to be a lot of understanding and appreciation for what I’ve contributed to the fight for balanced patent policy, and that’s great. But some people misunderstood my remark: the decision hasn’t been taken yet, and it’s not an appropriate point in time to say which outcome is more likely because a lot can still happen in one week. Come August 28, I’ll decide and announce.

    What transpired from of the responses isn’t really a surprise: to many people I’m simply “Mr. NoSoftwarePatents” because that’s the context in which they first came to know me.

      [Read more...]
    Sun?s Simon Phipps? personal opinion: No Software Patents!
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    I just saw this article:
    http://opensource.sys-con.com/read/261119.htm

    It quotes from the personal (not corporate!) blog of Simon Phipps, Sun’s chief open source executive. The first time I heard Simon speak out on patents was in November 2004 at an FFII conference in Brussels. A couple of months earlier, I had criticized him in the forum of NoSoftwarePatents.com in a way that I later on regretted. Even though the NoSoftwarePatents campaign was highly successful, there are three or four things that I shouldn’t have said or written during those days, and what I said about Simon’s credibility has the top spot among that list of


      [Read more...]
    Two more weeks of political summer hiatus
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    On August 28 — i.e., in two weeks from tomorrow — the European Parliament will return from its summer vacation. You can find the EP’s calendar here: There are different color codes, and those days which have no color at all are holidays and vacation days.

    While the EP is not the only EU institution, it’s clearly one of the most important ones, and its return marks the end of what is usually the slowest part of the summer season in Brussels. Upon its return, the parliament is going to take a look at patent policy again, and is in particular going to evaluate the outcome of the European Commission’s patent policy hearing that took place in Brussels on July 12. In late May, several

      [Read more...]
    Renominated to Managing Intellectual Property magazine?s ?top 50 most influential persons in intellectual property? list
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    A couple of days before Wednesday’s European Commission hearing, I learned that Managing Intellectual Property magazine, the leading international magazine for IP owners which has more than 10,000 readers around the globe, renominated me to its annual list of the “top 50 most influential persons in intellectual property”.

    The first time I appeared on that who-is-who list was a year ago, and ZDNet reported on that fact under the humorous headline “Anti-patent campaigner hailed as IP hero”.

      [Read more...]
    Day One of New EU Patent War
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    - PRESS RELEASE -

    DAY ONE OF NEW EU PATENT WAR:
    EU COMMISSION PUSHES FOR LITIGATION AGREEMENT

    EU internal market commissioner McCreevy said at yesterday’s hearing
    on the future of European patent policy in Brussels that he wants to
    “move forward” with the European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA) -

    Anti-software patent campaigners vehemently oppose the EPLA,
    claiming it is “from a software patents point of view […] far worse”
    than the directive they defeated in the European Parliament last year

    Brussels (July 13, 2006) - At yesterday’s European Commission hearing in Brussels on the future of European patent policy (






      [Read more...]
    European Commission may ask European Court of Justice for opinion on EPLA ratification
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    As I explained in my previous blog entry, EU internal market commissioner Charlie McCreevy is going to announce pretty soon that he wants to help to get the European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA) ratified. The EPLA is a new attempt to make software and business method patents more enforceable in Europe, and beyond that effect, it would generally encourage certain types of patent holders to litigate.

    But there’s a technical problem (”technical” in terms of “legally technical”): The European Commission’s legal services say the EPLA is a so-called “mixed agreement” that the member states of the EU cannot conclude on their own: they need the EU involved. To be very precise, it’s not the EU (European Union), but the EC (European

      [Read more...]
    No doubt: EU Commissioner McCreevy is determined to back the EPLA (European Patent Litigation Agreement)
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    Superficially, it appears that the European Commission is going to evaluate the 2,500+ replies it received to its January 2006 questionnaire on patent policy as well as the input it will receive at this coming Wednesday’s (July 12) hearing prior to deciding how to move forward in the area of patent policy.

    However, it would be naive to believe there is even the smallest doubt as to what EU internal market commissioner Charlie McCreevy intends to do. He has decided on that a long time ago, at least a number of months, possibly as early as last fall.

    McCreevy has a new game plan after his failure to push the software patent directive through last year. That directive was not his baby originally:

      [Read more...]
    What?s the gist of a hearing?
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    Yesterday I published the text of the short speech I’m going to give at the European Commission’s patent policy hearing on Wednesday (July 12). I think I should explain to the non-politicos among you what the term “hearing” means in this context.

    Governments, quasi-governmental bodies (which is how I’d describe the European Commission, non-judgmentally) and legislators (for the most part, that means parliaments or subsets of a parliament, such as a committee or a party) frequently conduct hearings. At a hearing on a particular topic (in this case, patent policy), politicians and their staffs listen to people who are, personally or professionally, affected by a future

      [Read more...]
    Manuscript for my speech at the European Commission?s upcoming hearing on the future of the European patent system
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    This coming Wednesday (July 12), I am going to speak during the litigation part of the European Commission’s patent policy hearing in Brussels. The hearing marks the end of a consultation process that began in January when the Commission published a questionnaire, in reply to which I wrote a position paper. At the hearing I am going to deliver the following short speech:

    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Some of you may already know me as the founder of the NoSoftwarePatents campaign, but let me start by introducing myself a little more specifically. I’m an

      [Read more...]
    Evidence for Mark Webbink?s pro-patent directive lobbying on July 5, 2005
    +0 Vote Up -0Vote Down

    In my previous blog article, I mentioned the fact that Red Hat’s deputy general counsel, Mark Webbink, lobbied in the European Parliament on July 5, 2005 (the day before the EP’s decisive vote to reject the software patent bill) to keep the software patent directive alive.

    I had not anticipated the kind of Internet debate that this statement would trigger, including some insulting emails that were sent to me, and least of all I would have expected Mark Webbink to call into question the “veracity of [my] statements”, which is what he did in the discussion below this LWN.net article. He knows exactly what he did.

    The word “motivations” also appears in that posting. It’s really

      [Read more...]
    Showing entries 1 to 30 of 42 Next 12 Older Entries

    Planet MySQL © 1995, 2014, Oracle Corporation and/or its affiliates   Legal Policies | Your Privacy Rights | Terms of Use

    Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders. It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Oracle or any other party.